Submission to the 2026-27 Safeguard Mechanism Review
The Safeguard Mechanism is in need of refinements in order to continue delivering on its role in supporting industry decarbonisation.
A key challenge is ensuring our existing production plants remain competitive. The current trend is for new large industrial plants to be built in places with fewer emissions restrictions, like Indonesia. A poorly tuned Safeguard regime could drag on these exporting Australian firms. Safeguard Mechanism rules should remain stable over time to bring certainty to large ($1-5 billion) long-term (20–25-year cycles) investments in hard-to-abate industries.
The design of a facility largely sets its lifetime emissions. It is therefore important for the current review to make minor changes to the Safeguard Mechanism to better support industry to achieve technology-driven emissions reductions.
ATSE makes the following recommendations to refine the Safeguard Mechanism:
Recommendation 1: Define sector-specific standards for low-carbon technologies, linked to streamlined approval processes.
Recommendation 2: Encourage low-carbon design by applying a discount rate to ACCUs for new facilities, facility expansions, and significant renewal of capital equipment on existing facilities that do not meet these standards.
Recommendation 3: Consider reducing the Safeguard Mechanism threshold.
Recommendation 4: Sequence post-2030 coal mining baseline arrangements with improvements to National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (NGER) fugitive methane estimation methods and ensure method-driven changes in reported emissions are handled as measurement corrections rather than as headroom or emissions growth.
Recommendation 5: Base eligibility to trade-exposed baseline adjustment (TEBA) on carbon leakage risk and not on the Safeguard Mechanism emissions cost.